Your LLM feature has no error signal when it gets worse. Drift, hidden hallucinations, and missing monitoring let decay hide inside plausible outputs.
LLM Engineering
Building and operating LLM features: RAG, evals, routing, cost and latency.
You patched your prompt for the tenth time and output still drifts. Fine-tuning helps, but only after evals and prompting stop moving the needle.
A clever prompt produces one good output. A product must survive users you never met, and the prompt cannot carry that weight alone.
You switched to smaller models and costs barely moved. The problem is not which model you picked, it is that no one decides which request deserves which model.
Your p95 dashboard says the platform is healthy, but users still complain. LLM latency has two phases, and your monitoring probably only sees one.
Token prices hit record lows, yet agentic workloads multiply token usage so fast that cost still decides which features survive production.
A great prompt still fails randomly. Evals are how you catch those failures before customers do, and they decide whether your AI ships or stalls.
AWS Bedrock now lets one setting pick retrieval-only, single-shot, or agentic search. Field reports say most RAG failures are engineering choices, so pick the cheapest mode that works.